|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion
   |
Posted - 2010.07.14 19:51:00 -
[1]
OMG!!!
*bows to tanis* I feel honored that you have read my thread and took the idea to the extreme!
CCP TANIS FTW!
|
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 22:16:00 -
[2]
Wow, you guys are whiny and greedy. so that being said, you should really read your posts, my nieces and nephews don't whine as much as you guys do.
Anyway the benefit - finally finding that lag monster on the server side and kill it. If that isn't a benefit enough then go back to that one game that mr t plays.
Other rewards - did you guys not read his entire post? ships and sp to play around with on test server? I remember the day ccp staff put guardian vexors on the market on the test server. Epic lag and hilarity ensued.
Well why not just watch fleet fights on TQ and fix it from there?
- sorry kids fixing stuff doesn't work like that. I know people in fleet fights aren't running the famous Logserver which gives ccp detail realtime reports of how your machine, client and communication with the server. So unless 0.0 runs logserver during fleet fights and turn it in to ccp.......
#2 Do you guys really want ccp testing fixes live on tq? Seriously are you that dumb?
You guys say ccp are making no effort to fix stuff, there is a dev blog and other stuff proving that they are, but you take it and slap them in the face, and tell them to fix it. It's really kinda insulting to them. BUT the more effort we put into helping them find the lag problem the faster they can get off that project and get to the back log of changes.
DID not a single one of you think that they have a lot of people trying to fix the problem? That they would rather be fixing the back log of changes than finding why lag is happening?
/end rant
Finally - I agree with the braveheart at the office, but change it for CCP defending it from the creators of that one game company. And record it.
|
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion
|
Posted - 2010.08.04 19:58:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Hulkageddon Jackpot
Originally by: grrfsweld
now, how exactly should TESTING fixes work then? not everything is serverside, you mormon.
Rafa Benitez says get out!
oh I don't know... maybe because testing with the actual client in use first is considered good practice ?
But then it's not like I spent years doing QA or anything  .
After that, you add a simple non-intrusive way for people to automatically generate a sisi setup from their regular one (here's a though place a "help us test!" button on the login screen to run the script) RATHER than requiring people who may not be computer savvy to perform folder operations. Add to that a tiny bit of incentive like skillpoints, and you can go try out some fixes.
P.S. Also please note that I am agnostic, and I find your insinuations of believing in a man in the sky offensive.
Maybe they have done enough testing with the actual client and these patches are to test the changes in the client to see if the fix they made works or not.
Just sayin.....
|
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion
|
Posted - 2010.08.06 01:55:00 -
[4]
TO ALL THE ABOVE SAYING A 2GB PATCH.
that was a new client not a patch. They autopatcher was not able to find the incremental patch, if you did a fresh copy of your tq folder, you needed to manually download it from the eve-o website.
The actually patch from tq to sisi was only a few megs. So guys be sure to read the patch messages carefully before running to the forums whining.
|
|
|
| |
|